|
Post by Milwaukee Brewers on Jan 29, 2018 6:46:45 GMT -5
This poll is to determine whether to allow teams to spend the full 20 million allocated to the minor league roster, at the moment we have 60 spots and are unable to use the rest of the money unless we drastically overbid on a minor leaguer, this would still cap at 100 prospects 100 x 0.2mil = 20mil, it would allow teams to use the cash on further prospects without having to sit at the limit with cash to burn. My main point for that is, the fact the majority if not all minor league players are worth 0.2mil so you are not able to use that full 20mil without needlessly overpaying for guys 60 x 0.2mil = 12mil that leaves you with 8mil theoretically speaking if you’re willing to send players down or bid higher than 0.2 on minor leaguers that’s fine, but it gives all teams the option to fully utilise the 20mil Please leave a vote
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 8:14:12 GMT -5
this is a vague poll really it is trying to allow for 100 prospect limit instead of the 60 we have now. you can spend the 20M you have with the current system.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 10:37:58 GMT -5
I agree with Cubs, we dont need 100 minor league prospects. It just allows for the hording of players.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 11:12:54 GMT -5
While it’s possible to spend your 20M on 60 players, as it stands now it is possible to have cap room left and a full MiLB roster. With that money not transferable, it just allows for money a team can’t use. There is no reason to have 2 restrictions on minor leaguers in a league this deep.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 11:14:05 GMT -5
And 100 prospect, while possible, is VERY unlikely as no one is going to get 100 prospects for the minimum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 12:11:14 GMT -5
barry will
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2018 12:25:50 GMT -5
Not if he has any player drafted in the 1st or 2nd round of our rookie draft. Those players sign for .3 and .25, respectively. So, only a team that never keeps their 1st or 2nd round pick, or acquire one drafted by another team, could pull this off.
|
|
|
Post by Boston Red Sox on Jan 29, 2018 15:31:45 GMT -5
No idea what this even means.
|
|
|
Post by New York Mets on Jan 29, 2018 17:27:03 GMT -5
I'm not sure how to vote on this one. We have 20mil to use ... we have a MiLB roster of 60. So we are not presenting this poll correctly. As it is stating to allow a team to be able to use all of the 20 mil on MiLB or not allow it to be used up??? Guess real poll should stated over 60 Players or not I guess. Its not about the 20mil dollars...Correct?
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 29, 2018 17:56:36 GMT -5
I'm not sure how to vote on this one. We have 20mil to use ... we have a MiLB roster of 60. So we are not presenting this poll correctly. As it is stating to allow a team to be able to use all of the 20 mil on MiLB or not allow it to be used up??? Guess real poll should stated over 60 Players or not I guess. Its not about the 20mil dollars...Correct? Basically the poll is stating whether we should restrict MiLB roster sizes or make it "until you use your cap" restricted. Essentially, if you want an unrestricted MiLB roster size, vote yes. If you wanna keep it the way it is (60 spots), vote no.
|
|